absolute maximum rating - PMC

Result Filters

You searched 8+ million full text articles

Try this search in 34+ million citations and abstracts

PMC Full-Text Search Results

Items: 1 to 20 of 34208

<< First< Prev

Page of 1711

Next >Last >>

Select item 66750731.

Modeling user rating preference behavior to improve the performance of the collaborative filtering based recommender systems

Mubbashir Ayub, Mustansar Ali Ghazanfar, Zahid Mehmood, Tanzila Saba, Riad Alharbey, Asmaa Mahdi Munshi, Mayda Abdullateef Alrige

PLoS One. 2019; 14(8): e0220129. Published online 2019 Aug 1. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0220129

PMCID:: PMC6675073

Article PDF–4.9M

Select item 82909822.

Comparison of weekly and daily recall of pain as an endpoint in a randomized phase 3 trial of cabozantinib for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer

Elisabeth M Schaffer, Ethan M Basch, Gisela M Schwab, Antonia V Bennett

Clin Trials. 2021 Aug; 18(4): 408–416. Published online 2021 Apr 22. doi: 10.1177/17407745211009547

PMCID:: PMC8290982

Article PDF–236K

Select item 75163383.

Retrospective Evaluation of Sequential Events and the Influence of Preference-Dependent Working Memory: A Computational Examination

Sewoong Lim, Sangsup Yoon, Jaehyung Kwon, Jerald D. Kralik, Jaeseung Jeong

Front Comput Neurosci. 2020; 14: 65. Published online 2020 Sep 11. doi: 10.3389/fncom.2020.00065

PMCID:: PMC7516338

Article PDF–1.7M

Select item 99791954.

The Effects of Rating Designs on Rater Classification Accuracy and Rater Measurement Precision in Large-Scale Mixed-Format Assessments

Wenjing Guo, Stefanie A. Wind

Appl Psychol Meas. 2023 Mar; 47(2): 91–105. Published online 2023 Jan 12. doi: 10.1177/01466216231151705

PMCID:: PMC9979195

Article PDF–1.4M

Select item 104959995.

An experimental study on the performance of collaborative filtering based on user reviews for large-scale datasets

Sumaia AL-Ghuribi, Shahrul Azman Mohd Noah, Mawal Mohammed

PeerJ Comput Sci. 2023; 9: e1525. Published online 2023 Aug 25. doi: 10.7717/peerj-cs.1525

PMCID:: PMC10495999

Article PDF–4.0M

Select item 69196286.

An expanded rating curve model to estimate river discharge during tidal influences across the progressive-mixed-standing wave systems

Allan E. Jones, Amber K. Hardison, Ben R. Hodges, James W. McClelland, Kevan B. Moffett

PLoS One. 2019; 14(12): e0225758. Published online 2019 Dec 18. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0225758

PMCID:: PMC6919628

Article PDF–2.4M

Select item 101330617.

Effect of structural repairs on the load rating and reliability of a prestressed concrete bridge

Marwan Debees, Furkan Luleci, F. Necati Catbas

Adv Bridge Eng. 2023; 4(1): 8. Published online 2023 Apr 27. doi: 10.1186/s43251-023-00087-0

PMCID:: PMC10133061

Article PDF–3.6M

Select item 110203588.

User tendency-based rating scaling in online trading networks

Soohwan Jeong, Jeongseon Kim, Byung Suk Lee, Sungsu Lim

PLoS One. 2024; 19(4): e0297903. Published online 2024 Apr 16. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0297903

PMCID:: PMC11020358

Article PDF–2.6M

Select item 79319079.

Attribute-Aware Recommender System Based on Collaborative Filtering: Survey and Classification

Wen-Hao Chen, Chin-Chi Hsu, Yi-An Lai, Vincent Liu, Mi-Yen Yeh, Shou-De Lin

Front Big Data. 2019; 2: 49. Published online 2020 Jan 15. doi: 10.3389/fdata.2019.00049

PMCID:: PMC7931907

Article PDF–1.8M

Select item 654481710.

Biomechanical System Versus Observational Rating Scale for Parkinson’s Disease Tremor Assessment

Ping Yi Chan, Zaidi Mohd Ripin, Sanihah Abdul Halim, Muhammad Imran Kamarudin, Kwang Sheng Ng, Gaik Bee Eow, Kenny Tan, Chun Fai Cheah, Linda Then, Nelson Soong, Jyh Yung Hor, Ahmad Shukri Yahya, Wan Nor Arifin, John Tharakan, Muzaimi Mustapha

Sci Rep. 2019; 9: 8117. Published online 2019 May 31. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-44142-1

PMCID:: PMC6544817

Article PDF–2.0M

Select item 1004243511.

Methylphenidate for children and adolescents with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD)

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023; 2023(3): CD009885. Published online 2023 Mar 27. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009885.pub3

PMCID:: PMC10042435

Article PDF–8.4M

Select item 836711412.

One Decade of Online Patient Feedback: Longitudinal Analysis of Data From a German Physician Rating Website

Martin Emmert, Stuart McLennan

J Med Internet Res. 2021 Jul; 23(7): e24229. Published online 2021 Jul 26. doi: 10.2196/24229

PMCID:: PMC8367114

Article

Select item 1055325713.

Ranking versus rating in peer review of research grant applications

Robyn Tamblyn, Nadyne Girard, James Hanley, Bettina Habib, Adrian Mota, Karim M. Khan, Clare L. Ardern

PLoS One. 2023; 18(10): e0292306. Published online 2023 Oct 5. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0292306

PMCID:: PMC10553257

Article PDF–571K

Select item 742456814.

Extracting user influence from ratings and trust for rating prediction in recommendations

Wenchuan Shi, Liejun Wang, Jiwei Qin

Sci Rep. 2020; 10: 13592. Published online 2020 Aug 12. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-70350-1

PMCID:: PMC7424568

Article PDF–2.5M

Select item 701153715.

Comparison of different rating scales for the use in Delphi studies: different scales lead to different consensus and show different test-retest reliability

Toni Lange, Christian Kopkow, Jörg Lützner, Klaus-Peter Günther, Sascha Gravius, Hanns-Peter Scharf, Johannes Stöve, Richard Wagner, Jochen Schmitt

BMC Med Res Methodol. 2020; 20: 28. Published online 2020 Feb 10. doi: 10.1186/s12874-020-0912-8

PMCID:: PMC7011537

Article PDF–974K

Select item 963480916.

Development of the Motivational Interviewing Coach Rating Scale (MI-CRS) for Health Equity Implementation Contexts

Sylvie Naar, Jason Chapman, Phillippe Cunningham, Deborah Ellis, Karen MacDonell, Lisa Todd

Health Psychol. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2022 Nov 4.

Published in final edited form as: Health Psychol. 2021 Jul; 40(7): 439–449. doi: 10.1037/hea0001064

PMCID:: PMC9634809

Article PDF–266K

Select item 960676917.

Statistical image properties predict aesthetic ratings in abstract paintings created by neural style transfer

Hannah Alexa Geller, Ralf Bartho, Katja Thömmes, Christoph Redies

Front Neurosci. 2022; 16: 999720. Published online 2022 Oct 13. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2022.999720

PMCID:: PMC9606769

Article PDF–5.1M

Select item 1043663918.

Rating versus ranking in a Delphi survey: a randomized controlled trial

Claudio Del Grande, Janusz Kaczorowski

Trials. 2023; 24: 543. Published online 2023 Aug 18. doi: 10.1186/s13063-023-07442-6

PMCID:: PMC10436639

Article PDF–969K

Select item 1017184519.

The Apraxia of Speech Rating Scale: Reliability, Validity, and Utility

Joseph R. Duffy, Peter R. Martin, Heather M. Clark, Rene L. Utianski, Edythe A. Strand, Jennifer L. Whitwell, Keith A. Josephs

Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2023 Mar; 32(2): 469–491. Published online 2023 Jan 11. doi: 10.1044/2022_AJSLP-22-00148

PMCID:: PMC10171845

Article PDF–1.3M

Select item 475522720.

A novel framework for discharge uncertainty quantification applied to 500 UK gauging stations

G. Coxon, J. Freer, I. K. Westerberg, T. Wagener, R. Woods, P. J. Smith

Water Resour Res. 2015 Jul; 51(7): 5531–5546. Published online 2015 Jul 19. doi: 10.1002/2014WR016532

PMCID:: PMC4755227

Article PDF–4.2M

<< First< Prev

Page of 1711

Next >Last >>

Supplemental Content

Filter your results:

Manage Filters

PMC Images search for absolute maximum rating

Figure 5

Absolute difference between the effort reported by smokers and non-smokers in the PD group through the RPE scale to 90% VO₂max and HR measured at 90% VO₂max. HR, heart rate; PD, panic disorder; RPE, rating of perceived exertion. *Maximum value.

Misinterpretation of the Borg’s Rating of Perceived Exertion Scale by patients with panic disorder during ergospirometry challenge

BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med. 2017;3(1):e000164.
Figure 37

Results of Method 2.1 with a lifespan of 12 frames. (a) the weighted average rating with the average mean absolute error of the weighted rating and (b) boxplots of the distribution of the statistical sets of the results of the individual sections evaluated indicating: minimum, 1st quartile, median, 3rd quartile, maximum.

A System for the Detection of Persons in Intelligent Buildings Using Camera Systems—A Comparative Study

Sensors (Basel). 2020 Jun;20(12):3558.
Figure 41

Results of Method 2.2 with a lifespan of 40 frames. (a) the weighted average rating with the average mean absolute error of the weighted rating and (b) boxplots of the distribution of the statistical sets of the results of the individual sections evaluated indicating: minimum, 1st quartile, median, 3rd quartile, maximum.

A System for the Detection of Persons in Intelligent Buildings Using Camera Systems—A Comparative Study

Sensors (Basel). 2020 Jun;20(12):3558.
Figure 43

Results of Method 2.3 with a lifespan of 12 frames. (a) the weighted average rating with the average mean absolute error of the weighted rating and (b) boxplots of the distribution of the statistical sets of the results of the individual sections evaluated indicating: minimum, 1st quartile, median, 3rd quartile, maximum.

A System for the Detection of Persons in Intelligent Buildings Using Camera Systems—A Comparative Study

Sensors (Basel). 2020 Jun;20(12):3558.